Vaccination Info 

Should I Get a Flu Shot?

Article from the December 2016 Bible Banner

      Several years ago, I happened to meet a nurse working in the hospital oncology ward. She looked like she felt terrible. Her nose was stuffy. Her eyes were red and weepy, and periodically she would interject a sneeze into her handy Kleenex.
     Thinking it strange that she would come to work sick when there were people with weakened immune systems, I inquired if she had the flu. She assured me that she couldn’t possibly be sick because she had just gotten the flu vaccination the day before.
 I wasn’t so sure…
       According to, about 46% of Americans received the Flu shot last season. “The flu", is an infectious disease caused by an influenza virus that is spread through the air from coughs or sneezes and also by touching surfaces contaminated by the virus and then touching the mouth or eyes."  ttps:// 

      The CDC (Centers for Disease Control) “recommends a yearly flu vaccine for everyone 6 months and older.” And states that “…Flu vaccination can reduce flu illnesses and prevent flu-related hospitalizations.” 

      However, before dropping this article and running to the health department to get a flu shot – perhaps we should look at some other, not so well known, facts about the flu vaccine.

       Perhaps we should consider that there are thousands of different kinds of the flu (influenza subtypes) affecting people around the world. Here in the U.S. about 16 different flu shots have been approved by the FDA. None of these vaccines protect against all the different strains of flu virus. Each year the formulation for the influenza vaccine is selected based on the virus strains that are expected to circulate. In other words, the “active” ingredients of the flu shot are based on somebody’s best guess. 

Books  and PDFs

Image result for vaccination crisis
Vaccination Crisis 2004 edition.pdf Vaccination Crisis 2004 edition.pdf
Size : 708.78 Kb
Type : pdf

 CDC Vaccine Ingredient List PDF

excipient-table-2.pdf excipient-table-2.pdf
Size : 181.283 Kb
Type : pdf
         “It takes at least six months to produce large quantities of influenza vaccine. For vaccine to be delivered in time for vaccination to begin in the fall, manufacturers may begin to grow one or more of the vaccine viruses in January based on their best guess as to what
viruses are most likely to be included in the vaccine.” (emphasis added )

       In other words, there is no guarantee that the vaccination that they choose to give in a particular year will protect people from
the strain that actually shows up that year. Consider these news reports, “Flu vaccine effectiveness tends to vary from year to year.
Last winter, flu vaccine was 50 to 55 percent effective overall, which experts consider relatively good.”

Would you invest in brakes that worked only 50-55 percent of the time and then call that 'relatively good'?

     A Fox News report in Dec. of 2014 is very telling: “A sampling of flu cases so far this season suggests the current flu vaccine
may not be a good match for the most common seasonal flu strain currently circulating in the United States, the U.S. Centers for

        Furthermore, if we consider the so called, “side effects” of the flu vaccine, this is a little like buying brakes that may
malfunction 50 percent of the time as well as possibly causing flat tires, broken windshield wipers, corroded battery hookups, and
engine stalling, etc. The common effects of the flu vaccine include fever, shivering, fatigue, headache, muscle and joint pain. Less
common, but even more dangerous effects of the flu vaccine may include anaphylactic shock, convulsions/seizures, facial or cranial
nerve paralysis, encephalopathy, limb paralysis and development of the autoimmune paralysis known as Guillain-Barré syndrome.
Even the CDC has now admitted that the flu vaccine can cause Guillain-Barré syndrome.“Common side effects from the flu shot
include: Soreness, redness, and/or swelling from the shot; Headache; Fever; Nausea; Muscle aches; The flu shot, like other injections,
can occasionally cause fainting. Some studies have found a possible small association of injectable flu vaccine with Guillain-Barré

      A simple look at a few of the “extra” ingredients listed in the vaccine insert information for each dose will give us a clue as to why the human body reacts that way to the vaccinations. Here are just three of the vaccine brands.* And we have focused on only 4 chemicals.

Fluzone Intradermal Injection (2014-2015 Formula) = 20 mcg of formaldehyde

Flulaval Quadrivalent Intramuscular Injection (2015-2016 Formula) = 50 mcg thimerosal; 25 mcg formaldehyde,

Afluria Intramuscular Injection (Multi-dose 2016-2017 Formula) = 24.5 mcg of mercury per dose; 3 ng neomycin sulfate; 2 ng beta-propiolactone;

Most people don’t know what all these big names mean, so they just ignore them – but here are some easier to understand definitions.

Beta-propiolactone: A corrosive chemical that is carcinogenic, mutagenic, and hazardous to humans.

Neomycin: An antibiotic that interferes with the absorption of Vitamin B6 which in turn causes problems like epilepsy and retardation.

Thimerosal: A derivative of mercury, which is a known neuro-toxin linked to brain damage and autoimmune diseases.

Formaldehyde: A chemical that is highly toxic to all animals. It is also carcinogenic, and known to cause leukemia.

       Some other ingredients that people may wonder about include potassium chloride—since, although apparently edible, Wikipedia states it is “used to cause cardiac arrest as the third drug in the "three drug cocktail" for executions by lethal injection.” Vegetarians and vegans may also be concerned over that fact that the flu vaccines are egg-based or occasionally animal cell-based, including unclean animals like dogs. The CDC states, “A cell-based flu vaccine is made by growing viruses in animal cells, which is a different manufacturing process than the traditional egg-based manufacturing process that is used to produce most flu vaccines.

     So the remaining question is “If I decide not to get a flu vaccine, how can I avoid getting the flu?” The first tip is to boost the immune system that God gave you. Even the theory of vaccination is based on the use of the immune system. “A vaccine works by training the immune system to recognize and combat pathogens, either viruses or bacteria. To do this, certain molecules from the pathogen must be introduced into the body to trigger an immune response.”

      God made our bodies to fight disease and his plan is best for boosting the immune system. One health educator suggests, “A walk, even in winter, would be more beneficial to the health than all the medicine the doctors may prescribe. . .” {Healthful Living p.177}

      During the 1918 flu epidemic, a fresh air cure was proven to be beneficial “Records from an “open-air” hospital in Boston, Massachusetts, suggest that some patients and staff were spared the worst of the outbreak. A combination of fresh air, sunlight, scrupulous standards of hygiene, and reusable face masks appears to have substantially reduced deaths among some patients and infections among medical staff.”

     Other helpful agents in boosting your immune system and combatting the flu include raw garlic, ginger, elderberry, echinacea and foods containing vitamin C. Contrast showers and cold-mitten frictions also assist your immune system in resisting disease by increasing the white blood cell counts. Do your part by getting plenty of rest, water and good nutrition then claim the promise, “And ye shall serve the LORD your God, and he shall bless thy bread, and thy water; and I will take sickness away from the midst of thee.” Exodus 23:25

*You can find the current vaccine inserts here

 Immunization and Vaccination

Historic - Help or Hoax?

During the 1600’s people in Turkey began infecting themselves deliberately with mild forms of the disease smallpox, in the vain hope of making themselves immune to a severe attack of the disease. They would have themselves scratched with the liquid from blisters of a person who had a mild case. From this, some developed a light infection, and others heavy scarring—or death.

In 1718, Lady Mary Wortley Montagu learned about this practice when she went to Turkey with her husband, who had been sent as the British ambassador. While in Turkey, she had her own children inoculated, and they miraculously managed to escape the procedure without harm. Since she was known to be somewhat eccentric, no one seemed to listen to her when she told her fellow countrymen about it back home.

But in 1796 in Gloucestershire, England, a country doctor by the name of Edward Jenner decided to try inoculating the people with the disease cowpox in the hope it would give them immunity to the related disease smallpox.

He proceeded to inoculate an eight-year-old boy named James Phipps with cowpox, using the fluid from a cowpox blister on a milkmaid’s hand. Two months later, Jenner deliberately inoculated young James with smallpox itself. The boy did not catch the disease. The rest is history. He chose to call the process vaccination, from the Latin name for cowpow – vaccina. The treatment of vaccination then spread rapidly throughout most of Europe.

In 1885 Louis Pasteur, a French chemist, discovered that he could weaken germs, either by heating them or treating them with chemicals. He used this as the basis for his vaccines. This began the practice of injecting live germs into people. He tried his vaccine for rabies (hydrophobia) on a 9 year-old boy by the name of Joseph Meister, who had been severely bitten by a rabid dog. The boy miraculously survived. The rest is more history.

But here is some history that the medical cartels do not like to share with people.

“James Phipps, the eight-year-old boy initially vaccinated by Jenner in 1796, was revaccinated 20 times and died at the age of twenty. Jenner’s own son, who was also vaccinated several times, died at the age of twenty-one. Both deaths were caused by tuberculosis, a condition that some researchers have linked to smallpox vaccine. Joseph Meister was inoculated by Pasteur and survived the dog bite. But, on the same day, several other people, including the dog’s owner, were also bitten—and all continued in good health thereafter. Other children were not so fortunate. Mathiew Vidau died after being personally treated by Pasteur. Also, another child, Louise Pelletier, died after receiving the Pasteur treatment.”  The Vaccination Crisis p.165

Little by little, information started coming out proving that the vaccination of people wasn’t the “miracle cure” that people had been taught.

“Dr. Charles Bell Taylor, in the National Review for July 1890, gave a list of cases in which Pasteur’s patients had died while the dogs that had bitten them remained healthy.” Bechamp Or Pasteur? p.296

In other words, the vaccine had clearly killed those people, for the dogs were not rabid after all.

Here is another reference to a similar story related by Dr. Lutaud, of Paris:

“On February 28, 1889, Rascol and another man were attacked by a dog suspected to be rabid. In Rascol's case the dog's teeth did not penetrate the skin, but the other man was severely bitten. Neither of them wished to go to the Pasteur Institute, but Rascol was compelled by the French postal authorities to do so. He remained there under treatment from March 9 to 14, and on March 26 he resumed his duties. On April 12 severe symptoms set in, with pain at the points of inoculation, not at the bite, for he had not really been bitten. On April 14 he died of paralytic hydrophobia, which evidently must have been caused by the Pasteurian inoculations.The other man, who refused to submit to this anti-rabic treatment, remained well, though he had been severely bitten by the suspected dog.” The Humane Review 1907 p.68

It is evident that the original practice of vaccination held more dangers than it did benefits. And as we will see, this fact has not changed, even though years of research have yielded more advanced technical methods of performing vaccinations.

The Principle Idea of Vaccination

The concept of vaccination is to “artificially” introduce a certain virus/bacteria/parasite/fungus into the human body so that the human body can detect it and manufacture antibodies to fight off the disease. This is known as a “learned response.” If the body has these antibodies already produced when the person comes into “natural” contact with the virus, bacteria or parasite, then their immune system will have the capability to “fight off” the disease.

In a “theory” written on paper this concept “might” work quite well.

However, there are several severe “flaws” to this concept. Among which are:

·         First of all, the human body’s immune system has several “defense” mechanisms that “shield” it (so to speak) from viruses, bacteria and the like. The first and most important of these is the body organ that we call “skin”. God designed “skin” not only to hold our bodies together, but to protect our internal organs and mechanisms from outside contaminates that could cause infection. Most vaccinations are given by injection – where a needle is inserted through the skin – bypassing the human body’s first line of defense – and the virus or bacteria is injected straight into the bloodstream. This means that instead of the contaminant having to enter the body through all the different channels (skin, mouth, nose, etc.) that God designed to protect the body, which would give the body time to analyze and filter and build a defense; the contaminant bypasses all of them and goes straight to the “life support system” (the blood). This causes the body to go into “panic mode” and scramble to throw together any type of hasty “defense” that it possibly can. Anyone who has ever served in a military operation knows that the first line of defense is one of the most crucial. But since vaccination is supposed to work so well, maybe we should just use these tactics in war as well. If we open our “front lines” and allow the enemy to “bypass” them, then perhaps we will develop an immunity to them?!!?

·         Second of all, a vaccine is never “pure”. All vaccines contain not only traces of the cultures that they were grown on; but they also contain chemicals and additives – many of which are deadly toxic. Would you want to take some “poison” and mix it with radioactive waste and drink it, with the hope that it would make you “immune” to the poison?

·         Third, this “learned response” theory fails to take into account that the Memory T cells that fight infection are “distressingly slow learners” who require several generations of intensive stimulation to make a lasting impression on the T cells.

“No vaccine trial to date has been able to produce significant numbers of memory T lymphocytes…” University of Chicago Medical Center, T-cell memory finding may provide key to cancer, AIDS vaccines; 3-11-1999

The concept that you should “fix what isn’t broken” lies at the heart of the vaccination myth, whether they want to admit it or not. That is why they want to take a perfectly well person and inject a dangerous vaccine into them to supposedly “protect” them from a disease that, in reality, they may never encounter “naturally” anyway.

But this concept goes against what the Bible teaches.

Matt. 9:12  But when Jesus heard that, he said unto them, They that be whole need not a physician, but they that are sick.

It makes much more sense for us to keep our God-given immune system functioning at peak performance by living a life that is in accord with the health laws that God, our Creator, prescribed for us in our “owner’s manual” (The Bible).

Does it Work?

Today, many people are taught from an early age, that vaccines are necessary and without vaccination, the human race will die off. This “false flag” type of propaganda ignores the facts of the case and only promotes its lies.

Yes, there are some indications that modern man has been able to “eradicate” many of the “dangerous diseases” that people were dying of a couple hundred years ago. BUT, is it correct science to give the credit of that accomplishment to vaccines?

The truth of the matter is that with the growth of knowledge, mankind also gained more knowledge of the importance of having better hygiene and better nutrition.

It used to be that a woman stood a better chance of survival from some sort of accident than she did from the natural process of having a baby. That was, until someone figured out that the doctors were going straight from the morgue examination room to the labor/delivery room – without washing their hands. When they began washing their hands before delivering a baby, the mortality rates of the women dropped significantly. But the credit for that can’t be given to a vaccine or drug – it is simply a confirmation of the health laws given in the Bible.

Here is a quote from the spring 2015 issue of Faith on the Line magazine:

“Extensive epidemiological data shows that concurrent with progressively improved nutrition and sanitation, massive declines in life-threatening infectious diseases occurred historically either without, or far in advance of mass artificial immunization efforts for a wide range of specific diseases. These include inter alia: measles; diphtheria; pertussis (whooping cough); tuberculosis; influenza; and scarlet fever. This represents irrefutable evidence that vaccines are not at all necessary for the effective and sustained elimination of a very wide range of human infectious diseases.” Dr. Raymond Obomsawin PhD. referencing The Road to Health, World Health Forum, vol.10, 1989, p.410 & 411

Perhaps this graph, compiled from government statistics, will give you a better picture of what Dr. Obomsawin is talking about.

 As you can see, measles mortality rates were largely eradicated by better “nutrition and sanitation” more than 10 years before the vaccine was ever introduced. Yet today, because of the “Pro-Vaccine” propaganda, most people think that it was the vaccine that brought an end to the disease.

It is this same type of propaganda that people trust in and fall back on when confronted with any “anti-vaccine” information, simply because, they don’t want to believe that they have been taught a lie.

Polio and its “Cover”

One of the most common defenses stated to support vaccination is the propaganda story of how we eradicated the dread disease polio by using vaccines. If you say something against vaccination – it seems that everyone always says “What about Polio?!”

However, there are some cold hard facts that many people have been able to unearth that tell a very different story. Let’s take a look at some of these facts.

In 1952, Jonas Salk combined three types of polio virus which he had grown in cultures made from monkey kidneys. Then using formaldehyde, he “killed” or inactivate the viral matter so that it would trigger an antibody response supposedly without causing the disease. In 1953, his findings were published in the Journal of the American Medical Association.  In February-April of 1954 this country’s first polio immunization campaign field trial was launched at Arsenal Elementary School and the Watson Home for Children in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; then it spread to involve about 1.8 million children, in 44 states from Maine to California. The results of the field trial were announced 12 April 1955. It was declared to be a success.

But shortly after this announcement hundreds of people contracted polio from the Salk vaccine and many died. It was discovered that the “killed” vaccine still had “live” virus in it.

Cases of polio increased in the U.S. after mass inoculations - Vermont had reported 15 cases of polio during the one-year report period ending August 30, 1954 (which would be before mass inoculations had taken effect), compared to 55 cases of polio during the one-year period ending August 30, 1955 (which would be after mass inoculations had taken effect) – that is a 266% increase. Here is a chart showing the increase of the cases of polio between 1954 and 1955 – due to the Salk vaccine.

Information Source: U.S. Government statistics 

 Then in 1957, a man named Albert Sabin developed a “live-virus” (oral) vaccine against polio. He believed that Salk’s “killed-virus” vaccine would not be as effective in preventing epidemics. He wanted to simulate a real-life infection with his vaccine. This meant using a weakened form of the live virus. He experimented with thousands of monkeys and chimpanzees before he finally isolated a rare type of polio virus that could reproduce in the intestinal tract without penetrating the central nervous system. In 1958, it was tested in the United States and in 1963 Sabin’s vaccine became available for use as an oral “sugar-cube.”

Information Source: International Mortality Statistics (1981) by Michael Alderson 

Notice that polio was declining by itself – BEFORE the vaccines were introduced. This is because of an increase in knowledge about nutrition and hygiene – not the vaccines.

A poor diet has also been shown to increase susceptibility to polio [Chandra RK. Reduced secretory antibody response to live attenuated measles and poliovirus vaccines  in malnourished children. British Medical Journal 1975; ii:583–5.]

Dr. Benjamin Sandler, a nutritional expert at the Oteen Veterans’ Hospital, documented a relationship between polio and an excessive use of sugars and starches. He compiled records showing that countries with the highest per capita consumption of sugar, such as the United States, Britain, Australia, Canada, and Sweden (with over 100 pounds per person per year) had the greatest incidence of polio. In contrast, polio was practically unheard  of  in  China  (with its sugar use of only 3 pounds per person per year) [McBean  E. The Poisoned Needle. Mokelumne Hill, California: Health Research, 1957:116.]

Now comes the “interesting part!”

When the polio vaccine was introduced in 1954, the cases of polio started climbing. They realized that to protect the reputation of the Salk vaccine, something had to be done, so in 1955 – they re-wrote the definition of what constituted “Polio” – to cover up the fact that polio was increasing.

Suddenly, thanks to the new definition, cases of polio started decreasing – but, unknown to the general public, cases of new diseases (which would have originally been labeled as polio) began to rise. 

Information Source: The Los Angeles County Health Index: Morbidity and Mortality, Reportable Diseases. 

Information Source: Congressional Hearings, May 1962; and National Morbidity Reports taken from U.S. Public Health surveillance reports. 

“Prior to 1954, the following undoubtedly hid behind the name “poliomyelitis”: Transverse Myelitis, viral or “aseptic” meningitis, Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS)- (what Franklin Delano Roosevelt had)4, Chinese Paralytic syndrome, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, epidemic cholera, cholera morbus, spinal meningitis, spinal apoplexy, inhibitory palsy, intermittent fever, famine fever, worm fever, bilious remittent fever, ergotism, post-polio syndrome, acute flaccid paralysis(AFP).

Included under the umbrella term “Acute Flaccid Paralysis” are Poliomyelitis, Transverse Myelitis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, enteroviral encephalopathy, traumatic neuritis, Reye’s syndrome etc.

Before you believe that polio has been eradicated, have a look at this graph of AFP and Polio 

If you are wondering why there is no data prior to 1996, go to the WHO website for AFP and you will see that there is no data prior to 1996, and note that AFP continues to rise in 2011. Acute Flaccid Paralysis (AFP) is just another name for what would have been called polio in 1955, and is used to describe a sudden onset of paralysis. It is the most common sign of acute polio, and used for surveillance during polio outbreaks. AFP is also associated with a number of other pathogenic agents including enteroviruses, echoviruses, and adenoviruses, among others. But in 1955, there was no attempt to detect anything other than polio in cases of AFP. Once the vaccine was mass marketed, the game changed.” Smoke, Mirrors, and the “Disappearance” Of Polio, Suzanne Humphries, MD

4)  Goldman.2003.”What was the cause of Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s paralytic illness?” J Med Biog, 11:233-240 

“Polio has not been eradicated by vaccination; it is lurking behind a redefinition and new diagnostic names like viral or aseptic meningitis. When the first, injectable, polio vaccine was tested on some 1.8 million children in the United States in 1954, within 9 days there was huge epidemic of paralytic polio in the vaccinated and some of their parents and other contacts.  The US Surgeon General discontinued the trial for 2 weeks.  The vaccinators then put their heads together and came back with a new definition of poliomyelitis.  The old, classical, definition:  a disease with residual paralysis which resolves within 60 days has been changed to a disease with residual paralysis which persists for more than 60 days.  Knowing the reality of polio disease, this nifty but dishonest administrative move excluded more than 90% of polio cases from the definition of polio.   Ever since then, when a polio-vaccinated person gets polio, it will not be diagnosed as polio, it will be diagnosed as viral or aseptic meningitis.  According to one of the 1997 issues of the MMWR, there are some 30,000 to 50,000 cases of viral meningitis per year in the United States alone.  That's where all those 30,000 - 50,000 cases of polio disappeared after the introduction of mass vaccination. One must also be aware that polio is a man-made disease since those well-publicized outbreaks are misrepresented that those huge outbreaks were causally linked to intensified diphtheria and other vaccinations at the relevant time.  They even have a name for it: provocation poliomyelitis.” Viera Scheibner, Ph.D CV

It was also later discovered that both the injected vaccines and the oral vaccines had been contaminiated with the cancer causing SV40 virus.

“SV40 was the 40th virus found in rhesus monkey kidney cells when these cells were used to make the polio vaccine. This virus contaminated both the Inactivated Polio Vaccine (IPV) created by Dr. Jonas Salk and the Oral or "Live" Polio Vaccine (OPV) created by Dr. Albert Sabin. In 1961, SV40 was discovered by Dr. Bernice Eddy of the National Institute of Health, Division of Biologics when she took the material used to grow polio vaccines and injected it into hamsters. Tumors grew in the hamsters. Her discovery was subsequently validated by Drs. Maurice Hilliman and Benjamin Sweet of Merck. Upon the discovery that SV40 was an animal carcinogen that had found its way into the polio vaccines, a new federal law was passed in 1961 that required that no vaccines contain this virus. However, this law did not require that SV40 contaminated vaccines be thrown away or that the contaminated seed material (used to make all polio vaccines for the next four decades) be discarded. As a result, known SV40 contaminated vaccines were injected into children up until 1963. In addition, it has been alleged that there have been SV40-contaminated batches of oral polio vaccine administered to some children until the end of the 1990's.”

This is what the CDC has to say about Polio:

“Polio was one of the most dreaded childhood diseases of the 20th century in the United States. Periodic epidemics occurred since the late 19th century and they increase in size and frequency in the late 1940s and early 1950s. An average of over 35,000 cases were reported during this time period. With the introduction of Salk inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) in 1955, the number of cases rapidly declined to under 2,500 cases in 1957. By 1965, only 61 cases of paralytic polio were reported…The last cases of naturally occurring paralytic polio in the United States were in 1979, when an outbreak occurred among the Amish in several Midwestern states. From 1980 through 1999, there were 162 confirmed cases of paralytic polio cases reported. Of the 162 cases, eight cases were acquired outside the United States and imported. The last imported case caused by wild poliovirus into the United States was reported in 1993. The remaining 154 cases were vaccine-associated paralytic polio (VAPP) caused by live oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV).”

In other words, the general public is led to believe that we have eradicated polio and that there hasn’t been any polio in the US since 1979 – but then, out of the other side of their mouth, even the CDC admits that 95% of the polio cases in the US (From 1980-1999) were contracted from the vaccine itself and were not naturally contracted.

It is rather interesting though, how they worded their polio “history” and statistics to hide the details of the increase of polio that we have just been looking at.

Total number of reported paralytic poliomyelitis cases (including imported cases) and number of reported vaccine-associated cases—United States, 1980-2012.


 The use of the OPV vaccine was discontinued in 2000. Now they only use IPV in the US.

As you can see, the propaganda that promotes the polio vaccine (as well as all the other vaccines) is very flawed!

Here is the list, from the CDC, of the ingredients in the IPV polio vaccine as of 2013 and a short description of what the ingredient is:


a neurotoxic chemical preservative


Carcinogenic tissue fixative & embalming agent


nephrotoxic antibiotic & preservative


Ototoxic & nephrotoxic antibiotic & preservative

polymyxin B

Neurotoxic antibiotic / binds to cells and alters their structure, making them more permeable / side effects include acute renal tubular necrosis

monkey kidney cells


Eagle MEM modified medium

cell culture medium

calf serum protein

blood collected from slaughterhouses

Medium 199

Cocktail of numerous ingredients for cell culture


To be continued...