Stuffed Shells and Vaccination
(From our newsletter "The Bible Banner" January 2021)
This story reminds me a little of what we are doing with the new mRNA vaccines—have we forgotten to account for something? Have we become overconfident in our scientific knowledge? And is it safe to play God?
Scientists are now working with both DNA and RNA vaccines. Think of DNA as the instruction manual for each human body. Only in the case of DNA parts of it can be switched off or on to give you blue eyes or brown, etc. RNA is like a copy made of a page of that manual and taken out to “the work area” to produce proteins, etc. Double strand DNA actually fits well the description of God’s word in Isaiah 28:9, 10. “Whom shall he teach knowledge? and whom shall he make to understand doctrine?... For precept must be upon precept, precept upon precept; line upon line, line upon line; here a little, and there a little:”
Sadly, those with a corona—a “crown of pride” (vs. 3) don’t want to listen (vs. 12) to God--perhaps they think they have a better idea. Indeed, “they err in vision, they stumble in judgment” (vs.7). “But the word of the LORD was unto them precept upon precept, precept upon precept; line upon line, line upon line; here a little, and there a little; that they might go, and fall backward, and be broken, and snared, and taken.” Isaiah 28:13 God’s word, His law, the DNA in our bodies is only a blessing if we are humble enough to follow His instructions, if we add to them we will be found a liar and will find that we have made a “covenant with death” and “we have made lies our refuge.” (Prov. 30:5,6 and Is. 28:15) It is not a godly power that Daniel warned would “think to change times and laws” (Daniel 7:25)
So what is different about these mRNA vaccines?
In short, instead of injecting the “virus” into your body, this vaccine will actually hijack your body programming by sneaking in a synthetic messenger RNA (tiny snippet of genetic code) with the instructions for the body to make “part of the virus”. In this case, they are programming your body to make “the viral spike (S) glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2” 1
According to PBS, “Amanda Cohn, an official with the CDC’s COVID-19 vaccine planning unit, said the vaccine consists of messenger RNA and four lipid nanoparticles…”2
Since the body would normally immediately repulse this invader mRNA “wolf,” they have cloaked it in “sheep’s clothing”—nano lipids. "’The lipids, which are fats, are very important because they form a little spherical shell around that mRNA,’" Dr. Schaffner of Vanderbilt University explained. Lipids "’help keep the mRNA intact and stable until it gets into your body and starts doing its work…’ After that, they dissolve and are removed by your body. Because of that, lipids are ‘unique’ to this type of vaccine, Jamie Alan, PhD, an assistant professor of pharmacology and toxicology at Michigan State University, tells Health.”3
Some worry that theoretically the “lipid nanoparticles” could be misused to deliver even more controversial substances into the body like the “injectable and affordable biosensors” that are “smaller than a grain of rice” made by Profusa, for example. In fact, “today scientists are presenting results showing tiny biosensors that become one with the body … and stream data to a mobile phone and to the cloud for personal and medical use.”4
But back to the modified RNA, according to Harvard, “Creating a RNA vaccine also requires some engineering of the RNA to achieve a strong expression of the antigen.”5
The MIT Technology Review expounds, “The mRNA in the vaccine, to be sure, isn’t quite the same as the stuff in your body…because a cell is full of defenses ready to chop up RNA, especially any that doesn’t belong there. To avoid that, what’s known as “modified nucleosides” have been substituted for some of the mRNA building blocks. The spike gene sequence can be tweaked in small ways for better performance [at least in theory], by means that include swapping letters.” 6
But is injecting modified RNA into our bodies really safe? What might happen if they forgot to account for the “splatter”? Or what if there are other pieces of the human coding that we are unable to see yet even with electron microscopes? Sciencenorway.no gives a hint, “Klungland [Professor Arne Klungland at the University of Oslo] and his colleagues have recently published research showing that modifications to RNA must be correct for DNA to work. A special m6A modification is needed when RNA separates the strands in DNA and copies a recipe. But it is equally important that the tag be removed again afterwards. If not, the DNA can be damaged. Both mice and humans get sick if RNA tags aren’t added and removed at the right time, he said.“‘This can lead to both cancer and neurodegenerative disease,’ Klungland says. “When he and his colleagues did an experiment where RNA modifications were not read properly, it turned out that fertilized eggs in live mice were unable to develop.”7
Despite this, as of December 11, 2020, the COVID-19 Vaccine, at least “the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine” was approved for “Emergency Use” and is touted as “safe and effective”8 by the CDC.
Of course, besides the normal tiredness, headaches, nausea, joint pain and feeling unwell, etc., the FDA flyer warns “There is a remote chance that the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine could cause a severe allergic reaction…Serious and unexpected side effects may occur. Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is still being studied in clinical trials.”9
The warning is a severe understatement. According to a document found on the CDC
website, on December 18 alone, there were 3,150 people who, following the
Covid-19 vaccine had “health impact events” defined as “unable to
perform normal daily activities, unable to work, required care from doctor or
health care professional”. On
the same day, it reports that the “CDC has identified 6 case reports of anaphylaxis”10,
in other words, six previously healthy people got a severe, potentially life-threatening
allergic reaction and could have died from their throats swelling shut, shock,
or cardiac arrest as a side effect of taking the vaccination. Only one of those
people had ever had a previous anaphylactic reaction (which interestingly, was
also to a vaccine).
But back to the dangers of adding instructions to the human body via mRNA. What if there were something in the modified RNA that formed an enzyme like reverse transcriptase, as found in retroviruses causing T-cell leukemia and lymphoma and HIV? Then, although normal transcription involves the synthesis of RNA from DNA; reverse transcription goes the opposite way. Reverse transcriptase is an enzyme which works 'backwards' from RNA to DNA. “Reverse transcriptase (RT), also known as RNA-dependent DNA polymerase, is a DNA polymerase enzyme that transcribes single-stranded RNA into DNA. …RNA viruses, such as retroviruses, use the enzyme to reverse-transcribe their RNA genomes into DNA, which is then integrated into the host genome and replicated along with it.”11
To add to the terrible and irreversible side effects that genetic modification could cause in the body, you now could conceivably now have your new “synthesized DNA” patented and owned. Medlineplus.gov informs us, “On June 13, 2013, in the case of the Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc.,...The Supreme Court's ruling did allow that DNA manipulated in a lab is eligible to be patented because DNA sequences altered by humans are not found in nature. The Court specifically mentioned the ability to patent a type of DNA known as complementary DNA (cDNA). This synthetic DNA is produced from the molecule that serves as the instructions for making proteins (called messenger RNA).”12
Any honest experts have to acknowledge that there are lots of unknown and unique risks involved in mRNA vaccines, including local and systemic inflammatory responses that may spur autoimmune conditions, cancer or organ damage. Another worry is the potential for mRNA vaccines to be maliciously deployed to trick a person’s body into attacking critical functions like cell repair, fertility and neurological function. This could occur if the spike protein was similar enough to another protein in the human body to confuse the immune system into attacking that protein in other places.
In addition, “In a speech given to the Pennsylvania Medical Freedom Press Conference on October 20, Dr. James Lyons-Weiler, who holds a Ph.D. in biology, described how the current COVID-19 vaccine being produced by Moderna, amongst others, has not undergone industry-standard testing, ignoring basic protocols… Lyons-Weiler asserted during the conference that ‘historically vaccines for coronaviruses have had a terrible safety record.’
“He went on to describe that, in his own peer-reviewed research, ‘prior to the development of any COVID vaccines, I found that all but one of the proteins in the SARS-CoV-2 virus have what we call unsafe epitopes.’ Continuing, he explained that these epitopes are ‘parts of proteins that are capable of causing immune conditions, autoimmune conditions, and immune responses against proteins in our own body.’ Attention was drawn to what Lyons-Weiler called ‘pathogenic priming,’”13
For example, “In SARS, a type of ‘priming’ of the immune system was observed during animal studies of SARS spike protein-based vaccines leading to increased morbidity and mortality in vaccinated animals who were subsequently exposed to wild SARS virus”14 In other words, in vaccine trials on animals, the vaccinated animals actually got sicker and died more often than those that were not vaccinated.
1-- . https://www.vumc.org/coronavirus/known-covid-19-contraindications
2-- https://www.pbs.org/newshour/health/cdc-says-people-with-history-of-severe-allergic-reactions-can-get-covid-19-vaccine3-- https://www.health.com/condition/infectious-diseases/coronavirus/pfizer-covid-19-vaccine-ingredient-list
4-- https://profusa.com/profusa-and-partners-announce/ https://profusa.com/injectable-body-sensors-take-personal-chemistry-to-a-cell-phone-closer-to-reality/
13-- https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/research-scientist-warns-coronavirus-vaccines-have-terrible-safety-record-historically 14-- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7142689/